----------------------------------------------------------------------- BIOINFORMATICS COLLOQUIUM School of Computational Sciences George Mason University ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Pfiesteria Hysteria: Fad or Fallacy Patrick Gillevet George Mason University Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:30 pm Verizon Auditorium, Prince William Campus Pfiesteria piscicida is a heterotrophic dinoflagellate that has been associated with fish mortalities and human health problems in estuaries along the Atlantic shore of the United States since 1992. This association has relied on the detection of P. piscicida motile cells in water samples collected from sites where fish mortality has occurred or close to areas were individuals described unusual dermal, respiratory, and neurological symptoms upon exposure to environmental water. It was hypothesized that the ichthyocidal activity of P. piscicida was reported to become apparent only when the vegetative forms (dinospores) emerge, after exposure to fish, from resting cysts that are found in environmental sediments. It has been further proposed that P. piscicida produces one or more novel exotoxins that affect fish and other organisms, including mammals. The action of these toxins on fish supposedly caused skin lesions, disrupt neural function, and eventually lead to fish death. It was concluded that this organism presented a grave threat to to human health and the promotion of the "the cell from hell" story had dramatic impacts on the tourist and seafood industries in the Northeastern United States. However, despite significant efforts over the past 13 years by numerous laboratories, there are no definitive no reports on the isolation and characterization of the toxin(s). The situation has been complicated further by the description of non-toxic or temporarily non-toxic strains that revert to toxicity under complex ill-defined conditions and by an unusually complex life cycle composed of multiple stages (24) of variable toxicity that are tied together in the so called Ambush Predator Hypothesis. To date, rigorous experimental data in support of all of the aforementioned claims is lacking. First, the actual existence of the amoeba stage has been recently questioned in several detailed studies ruling out the entire "Ambush Predator" hypothesis. Secondly, recent in vitro studies of the ichthyocidal activity of clonal P. piscicida in a tank bioassay format indicated that active proliferation of the dinospores can be associated with fish death but they require direct physical contact with the fish ruling out the presence of exotoxins. Thirdly, research has shown that the lesions observed in wild fish are in fact caused by other infectious organisms. Finally, a recent 5 year study by the CDC has demonstrated that there are no neurological effects in waterman exposed to estuarine waters. We conclude that the entire "Cell from Hell" hypothesis has not been based of rigorous, critically reviewed science and is an classic example of how the complex interaction between the scientific community, the press, public perception, funding agencies, and regulatory agencies can influence the progress of science. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Refreshments are served at 4:00 pm. Find the schedule and directions at http://www.binf.gmu.edu/colloq.html